logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2012.09.28 2011고합524
뇌물수수
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. On February 3, 2009, the Defendant was an executive officer of C&D on the charge, and from July 25, 2009, served as the Vice-President of D&D Power Distribution Team from July 25, 2009, and managed all the design and supervision of D&D works.

At around 15:00 on July 12, 2010, the Defendant received KRW 16 million in cash, which the representative of G (ju) who received illegal subcontracting, provided illegal subcontracting, convenience, etc. (hereinafter “tally referred to as “tallying cost”) in relation to “F nearby undergroundization construction,” which the E, an employee of the Defendant, is in charge of construction supervision at the 9th floor of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Construction Station.

In addition, from March 10, 2010 to around the above time, the Defendant received cash of KRW 32 million provided through E three times in total, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

Accordingly, the defendant received a bribe in relation to his duties as a executive officer of C corporation.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the statement of E, which corresponds to the facts charged, is difficult to believe, and the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone, is insufficient to recognize that the defendant was issued KRW 1 million as shown in the No. 1 of the crime list, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

1) On July 5, 2011, the Defendant consistently denied this part of the facts charged at an investigative agency up to this Court. (2) On the part of the police investigation on July 5, 2011, the Defendant stated to the effect that “I cafeteria was conducted with J, K, Defendant, and H, and then he was given a bag containing cash at the I cafeteria’s expense, and then H was given a plastic bag with each other at cash at the expense of the I cafeteria, K, Defendant, and H, but he received the degree of KRW 300,000 (Evidence No. 343 page)” (Evidence No. 343 of the evidence record), and around March 10, 2010, the Defendant was investigated by the police at the police on August 10, 201.

arrow