logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.3.18. 선고 2014구합75506 판결
심의결정통지처분취소의소
Cases

2014Guhap7506 Action to revoke the decision and decision

Plaintiff

A

Defendant

The Minister of Government Administration

Conclusion of Pleadings

March 4, 2016

Imposition of Judgment

March 18, 2016

Text

1. The Defendant’s disposition to dismiss the payment of consolation benefits, etc. issued to the Plaintiff on October 16, 2014 is revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Purport of claim

The same shall apply to the order.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 29, 2014, the Plaintiff asserted that it constitutes a bereaved family member as a victim of compulsory mobilization in foreign countries, and filed an application for consolation money, etc. with the Committee to Support Victims, etc. of Mobilization of International Forced Mobilization (hereinafter “the Committee”).

B. On October 16, 2014, the instant commission rendered a decision to dismiss the payment of consolation money, etc. pursuant to Article 22 of the same Act on the ground that it does not constitute a bereaved family member under Article 3 of the Special Act on the Support for Force Mobilization and Forced Mobilization, Etc. (hereinafter “Compulsory Mobilization Investigation Act”) on the ground that it does not confirm the relationship between the Plaintiff and B and his bereaved family members (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 11, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Related statutes;

It is as shown in the attached Table related statutes.

3. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

In addition to the whole purport of the pleading in Gap evidence No. 5, the plaintiff can recognize the fact that the plaintiff was born between Eul and the net C, a victim of overseas compulsory mobilization.

The Plaintiff is a child of B and constitutes a bereaved family member under Article 3 of the Compulsory Mobilization Investigation Act. The instant disposition issued on a different premise is unlawful.

4. Conclusion

The plaintiff's claim is justified and accepted.

Judges

The presiding judge, the Korean Judge;

Judges Kim Gin-young

Judges Yoon Jin-sik

Attached Form

A person shall be appointed.

arrow