logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.08.22 2013노3119
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (unclaimed Measures) in the summary of the grounds for appeal is established not only because it does not cause any danger or impediment to traffic, but also caused such danger or impediment due to the instant accident.

2. The purport of Article 50(1) of the Road Traffic Act is to ensure safe and smooth traffic by preventing and removing traffic risks and obstacles that occur on roads.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2002Do4452 Decided October 22, 2002, etc.). The evidence requested by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize that the defendant left the site of the accident and caused or obstructed traffic. Thus, the prosecutor’s assertion is without merit.

3. Therefore, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow