Text
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.
Reasons
Criminal facts
The defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of C digging machines.
At around 9:00 on March 18, 2013, the Defendant operated the above digging pool in E-owned land in Youngjin-gu, Youngjin-gu, Seoul. On March 18, 2013, the Defendant was engaged in the operation of the said digging pool to move off the frozen tower and freight partitions in E, together with E’s victim F (the age of 47).
At the time, the Defendant, in order to use the boomer for the movement of freezing towers, other than for its main purpose, such as loading, unloading, etc. of cargo, connected the boomer boomer with the wire ropes to the connecting boomer or the part of the body of people, which can be seen as those of the boomer, integrated these wire ropes into the cargo partitions for freezing the freezing engine, and moved them after operating the boomer. In such a case, the Defendant, who is engaged in operating the boomer, was obliged to take a duty of care in the course of operating the boomer boomer, while moving to the horizontal level when using the boomer line with which to check the weight of the boomer boomer boomer boomer boomer boomer boomer boomer boomer boomer boomer boomer boomer.
Nevertheless, while the Defendant neglected to do so and did not get off the victim who had been engaged in the booming line above, the Defendant, as seen above, caused the loss of the victim, such as the boom boom of the boomer connected with the wire ropes, which was cut off with the boomer’s boom, with the weight of the boomer, and the victim on the 2.5m high, left away from the floor at which the 2.5m high, and suffered the injury of the victim, such as the boom damage of the 12mix of the boomed 11m of permanently disabled persons.
Summary of Evidence
1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;
1. Determination as to the defendant's assertion of photograph, accident certificate, judgment, and medical certificate
1. The gist of the assertion is that the Defendant only carried out work according to the direction of the victim at the time of the instant case, and thus, occupational duties.