beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
The defendant shall be the applicant B with the amount of 18 million won acquired by deceit, and the applicant C with compensation.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2017 Highest 4310"
1. Fraud against the victim B;
A. On October 1, 2009, the Defendant was unable to pay the employee’s benefits to the victim, who was known to the general public on October 1, 2009, due to telephone communications.
After the end of the drilling, the gold paper borrowed 15 million won as the test to fully repay the gold. "The gold paper borrowed 15 million won."
However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the injured party, he thought that it was used for living expenses, etc., and there was no other property, and there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed money to the injured party.
The defendant deceivings the victim as above and received delivery of KRW 15 million from the injured party.
B. On May 17, 2012, the Defendant, on the part of the said victim, ordered the said victim to enter into a contract for construction on a face-to-face loan of expenses incurred in telephone conversations, and to fully repay all of the loans to the said victim up to KRW 15 million.
The phrase “the phrase was false.”
However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the injured party, he was thought to use it for the purpose of living expenses, etc., and there was no other property, and there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed money to the injured party.
The defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 3 million won from the injured party around that time.
2. On January 2, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was aware of the victim’s fraud on January 2, 2014, that “the house in which he was living in Daegu would drive away beyond the auction route.”
Since there is no place where two parts of green nests are in place, they should be arranged rapidly, and after one month, they borrowed 35 million won as a deposit for lease after one month."
Even if the victim borrows money from the victim, it was thought that a significant portion of it was used for living expenses, etc., there was no dunes child, and there was no other property, and there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed money to the victim.
The defendant is the victim as above.