A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 5, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud in the Suwon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 27, 2012.

On January 30, 2009, the Defendant had been working as the victim E-related office of Pyeongtaek-si in Pyeongtaek-si in the victim E-related office of around January 30, 2009, and the victim purchased the forest land of Pyeongtaek-si and developed it as the site for electric source housing. The Defendant can obtain a large benefit from each parcel of land while recognizing the procedure for authorization and permission in the design office.

In the event of investment of KRW 120,000,000, the previous loan was made within three to five months.

In addition to interest in KRW 150,000,000, 30,000 will be repaid and 1,50,000 won will be returned to the invested amount.

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, the above land was designated as a land transaction contract permission area on November 20, 200, and around October 17, 2005, in order to obtain a land transaction permission on the above land, it was difficult to develop it as a site for electric residence because the above land was designated as a cultural property protection area by the Gyeonggi-do Council for Cultural Review, and the permission to change the phenomenon of cultural heritage was required first to obtain a land transaction permission on the above land, and H et al., the owner of the above land was designated as a cultural property protection area on April 25, 2005.

In addition, the Defendant had a debt of 60 million won or more at the time, and paid 50 million won or more per month interest and received additional loans to pay interest, and thus, there was no idea to sell the land using the land transaction permission and other expenses.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) transferred KRW 99.6 million to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (I) in the name of the Defendant on the same day from the victim; and (c) received KRW 20,000,000 (two million,00 won check).

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim.