1. The Defendant’s KRW 500,000 and the Plaintiff’s annual interest thereon from October 21, 2013 to August 23, 2017.

1. On October 20, 2013, between 01:00 to 02:00, the Plaintiff was engaged in drinking alcohol and calculated the drinking value by drinking alcohol in the Daegu Seogu Seo-gu B “C”, and the Plaintiff had been engaged in drinking alcohol due to the drinking value problem. On the other hand, the Defendant was engaged in a slope E and the police box called the Plaintiff’s arms and carried the Plaintiff’s arms and carried the Plaintiff into the police box.

On October 20, 2013, from around 02:30 to 03:40 on the same day, the Plaintiff was under investigation by the D police box for an inte and F’s suspicion, and the Plaintiff was unable to avoid disturbance for about 10 minutes and 10 minutes under the influence of alcohol, such as “Iskn’s drinking house, whether Isn’t receive money from the slick, Isn’t want to get off the slick, and Isn’t want to get off the slick.”

After the investigation, the Plaintiff was able to shot back several occasions from E and F, but the police box was sent to the police officer in the 112 situation room or branch room and called to the police officer in the police box.

Accordingly, E notified that it can be arrested as a violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act if he continues to commit a disturbance, and then arrested the plaintiff as a flagrant offender.

The Plaintiff was prosecuted as a violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act by the Seogu District Court Branch 2014 High Court Decision 2014 High Court Decision 500,000 won against the Plaintiff on November 28, 2014. The Plaintiff appealed as Daegu District Court 2014No4713, but the said court rendered a decision dismissing the appeal on October 20, 2016. The Plaintiff appealed as Supreme Court Decision 2016Do1836, Jan. 6, 2017, but the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal on January 16, 2017. The said decision became final and conclusive on January 16, 2017.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Eul evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 8, Eul evidence Nos. 10 and images, significant facts to this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. Police officers E, F, G, H, and I. belonging to the Plaintiff’s assertion D police box.