Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On April 22, 2017, the Defendant and C: “F” restaurant operated by the Victim E in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si; on the ground that the Defendant and C took the place of drinking and alcoding, on the ground that the Defendant and C took the place of drinking and alcoding, C has broken off the remaining alcoholic beverage on the table, and “I show all the inside.”

D. The Defendant expressed the victim who is taking the above situation as his hand, and expressed the victim’s desire to take the victim as his hand, and the victim expressed the victim’s husband who took the above situation more than 20 minutes of the disturbance, such as making the victim’s husband’s hand over several times, and making the customer leave the scene.

As a result, Defendant and C interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force in collusion.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect C by the police;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and G;

1. On-the-spot photographs, images closure photographs (the defendant and his/her defense counsel took the defendant who did not have any error on his/her cell phone, and the defendant's act was committed in the course of resisting the above act. Thus, the defendant's act asserts to the effect that it is not unlawful because it constitutes a

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, i.e., the defendant and C continued to interfere with the victim's business after the police was dispatched twice due to the report of the victimized person, and ii) The victim's photographed the defendant and C's act of interference with business according to the method known by the police officer so called the victim's notification and recognized reasonable reasons, such as the circumstances taken. ③ The defendant stated in the judgment of the defendant was an aggressive act, such as the defendant's defense or a legitimate act.