1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts below the basis of facts may be acknowledged either in dispute between the parties or in combination with the whole purport of the pleadings at Gap evidence 1 to 4, 6, 16, 19 and Eul evidence 6 and witness B and C.

The plaintiff is a company that engages in the business of importing, distributing, selling, etc. computer equipment products and software, and the defendant is a person who became a member of the plaintiff company D on February 17, 2014.

B. Our bank (hereinafter “Korea bank”) refers to a system in which EDW EDW (Eterp Data Warehouse) is used to conduct marketing analysis, etc. using transferred data.

The expansion project (hereinafter referred to as the "project of this case") was promoted, and the defendant was in exclusive charge of the business against the Korean bank as well as the business affairs related to the order of the project of this case from the date of joining the plaintiff company.

Accordingly, the defendant is a company specialized in IT services of our financial group, such as data center construction services, integrated maintenance and repair services, and language singinging services, with the goal of providing optimal IT services that support the strengthening of competitiveness of our financial group, mainly for our banks and affiliates, with the aim of providing our financial group's best IT services.

(hereinafter referred to as “Korea EfIS”), as a result of the consultation with B, C, etc. on the order of the instant project, the Korean bank finally decided to proceed with the instant project on January 2016. Accordingly, the Plaintiff Company completed the work of comparing the system performance with the EDW extension (127 Tperf Tpercing Pitance) in March 2016.

C. However, immediately after the completion of the above EDW expansion work, B, C, etc., which was promised to provide the Plaintiff Company with the original 327 Tperf.