1. The Defendant’s KRW 30,841,636 as well as its annual 6% from March 9, 2017 to July 18, 2018, and the following.

1. Basic facts

A. On October 18, 2016, the Defendant contracted the Plaintiff with the cost of the interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior housing (hereinafter “instant housing”) located under the Defendant’s ownership (hereinafter “instant construction”).

B. The Plaintiff and the Defendant decided to exclude the instant construction contract, and the Plaintiff completed the instant construction work on or around January 17, 2017, and the Defendant paid KRW 73,048,200, excluding the cost of construction, to the Plaintiff as construction cost.

[Basis] Evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Evidence Nos. 1, 3, 4, and 5, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff asserts that the judgment on the cause of the claim performed the following additional construction works in addition to the instant construction works. Accordingly, the defendant asserts that the plaintiff's assertion that it is an additional construction works is included in the original quotation, or that the construction works were conducted at a level that supplements the plaintiff's failure to perform construction works as originally designed, or that the plaintiff arbitrarily performed construction works.

According to the results of the appraisal commission for Gap's 4, 5, 6, Eul evidence 2, Eul evidence 2, witness D's testimony, witness E's testimony, and witness E's appraisal of this court F, the plaintiff's additional construction as stated in the first written estimate (Evidence A 4) was conducted in addition to the construction of this case's first written estimate (Evidence A 4). The plaintiff's additional construction costs, including the general tester's profits, can be acknowledged as constituting a total of 38,837,263, etc. as stated below. Further, it is difficult to understand that the plaintiff's arbitrary construction without the defendant's consent for large costs not included in the first contract, and that it is difficult to understand that the plaintiff's arbitrary construction without the defendant's consent for the construction costs incurred in the first contract is being executed without any further construction without any counter-proof evidence.

The 1st floor toilets.