All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower judgment, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the Defendant was guilty of the remainder of the charges except for the violation of the Public Official Election Act due to offering money and goods related to the election campaign against E and L, on the grounds indicated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on facts beyond the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence or by misapprehending the legal doctrine

2. Examining the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the records, it is just to maintain the judgment of the court of first instance that acquitted or acquitted on the ground that the court below did not prove any crime regarding violation of the Public Official Election Act due to the provision of money or goods related to the election campaign against E and L for election campaign. There is no violation of law of logic and experience and free evaluation of evidence.

3. All appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.