A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete the sexual assault treatment program for 280 hours.

Criminal facts

On March 13, 1984, the defendant and the person to whom the attachment order was requested (hereinafter referred to as the "defendants") were sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for two years and six months, with prison labor for the crime of rape and bodily injury resulting from rape at the Suwon District Court on February 5, 1988, three years, with prison labor for the crime of rape and attempted rape at the Seoul Southern District Court on February 5, 198, and seven years, with the Seoul Southern District Court on May 9, 197, for the crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and Protection of Victims thereof (special robbery, etc.) at the Daejeon District Court on May 25, 2005, and three years.

On December 4, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for indecent act by compulsion, public performance and obscene act by compulsion, etc., and three years of imprisonment for a location tracking electronic device attachment, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Daejeon Prison on July 8, 201.

【Criminal Facts” around 10:42 on June 4, 2014, the Defendant: (a) reported that the victim D (22 years of age) she was faced with his body in the middle of Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Geumcheon-gu; and (b) committed an indecent act by force against the victim in a way that the victim’s body was flicked, and that the victim’s body was flicked, and that the victim’s body was flicked.

【The facts constituting the cause of an attachment order】 The Defendant committed a sexual crime again against a person who has had the record of attaching an electronic device for committing a sexual crime, such as the record of a criminal record, and committed a sexual crime two or more times, and the person who has been convicted of committing the sexual crime is deemed guilty and is likely to recommit

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The Defendant at D’s legal statement asserts that there was no fact of indecent act by force as indicated in the judgment on the ground of the lack of memory. However, in light of the content of damage made by D by the witness D, the appearance of the offender, the consistency of D’s name as the Defendant as the offender, the circumstance in which the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender, and the criminal records at the time of the instant crime.