logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.07.15 2015고정237
관세법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 20 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates the Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Transport Agency (E) D.

When it is intended to export goods, the name, size, quantity and price of the relevant goods, and other matters prescribed by Presidential Decree shall be reported to the head of the relevant customs office, and no goods shall be exported after filing a declaration thereon.

Nevertheless, if a small-scale clothing shop that exports clothing to Japan would be ordered to export clothing within an imminent period from the customer of Japan, instead of filing an export declaration under the name of the exporting company, (i) a delivery statement stating only the items and quantities without stating prices between 1 and 2 days prior to the date, and a delivery of the items to be exported directly to the final shipping agency or by her inner name, in lieu of a normal export declaration under the name of the exporting company; (ii) a delivery statement stating only the items and quantities to be exported.

“A final transport agency shall deliver to a final transport agency through an intermediate transport agency, and (2) an intermediate transport agency shall pack the items received from an exporter, prepare a stalking list, and deliver it to a final transport agency. ③ The final transport agency estimates the types and quantities of clothing expected based on the existing transactions before receiving a request for the export of the goods directly or through a foreign transport agency, and submits in advance an export declaration indicating the export price at the price equivalent to the commission of the final transport agency’s own or a third party’s name, “the export declaration indicating the export price” to the customs office, which was accepted in advance, has been exported by using an inaccurate export declaration with which the said declaration was filed in advance, and the clothes, etc. requested for the goods different from the above reported goods, etc., were exported in the way of carrying out shipment to the Japanese vessel.

The Defendant’s clothes to Japan upon request from G and other clothing exporters operating “F”.

arrow