The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant, who recognized all of the instant crimes, reflects his mistake.

When the defendant attempted to live together with the victim, but only the victim died, he attempted suicide once again, but failed again, and then voluntarily surrenders to the police.

The defendant has no record of criminal punishment except for a fine sentenced once due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

However, while each of the crimes of this case was committed with the victim living together by the defendant, each of the crimes of this case is aiding and abetting the suicide of the victim in such a way as to avoid shotning in the house, and it is not good that such crime is committed.

Due to each of the crimes in this case, the young victims became dead, and due to this, the bereaved family members of the victim seems to have suffered from mental shock and pain that are difficult to recover.

The defendant was unable to be used by the bereaved family members of the victim, and the bereaved family members of the victim were punished for the defendant.

In addition, considering the age, character and conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant, all the sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of this case and the scope of recommended sentencing guidelines for the enactment of the sentencing guidelines by the Supreme Court, it cannot be said that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit.