The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendants are not guilty.

1. The facts charged in this case and the summary of the judgment below

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case (i) around 16:30 on May 4, 2013, Defendant A: (a) considered the victim F (the age of 62) to pay for the issue of E and money in front of the E’s office, the Defendant: (b) considered the victim F (the age of 62) to pay for the issue of E and money; and (c) stated that “I am from the land inside the Party,” “I am the victim’s entrance and drinking room on hand, I am the victim’s hand when I am the victim’s entrance and drinking room for about 14 days.”

B. Defendant B, at the above date and place, was parked a vehicle on which F and F are on the mast of the Defendant’s shape E, and, at the same time and place, Defendant B used the victim in such a way that “whether or not a vehicle has been on the ground of this, why it has been loaded on the individual land, what is deducted, what is clamping, and what is clamb,” and boomed by putting soil and water into the body of the victim G (the 72 years old), who is frighting with soil and water and frighting into the body of the victim, and assaulted the victim in such a way that the victim’s clothes are milked.

B. (1) The lower court denied and contested the facts charged in this case with the same purport as seeing the lower court’s assertion of mistake of facts in the grounds for appeal, but the lower court found the Defendants guilty of all the facts charged in this case by comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated:

The victims made a concrete and consistent statement from investigative agencies to this court, and each statement of witness H and I also conform to this.

The victim F received treatment at the hospital after this case, and the sick name and the part of the injury described in the written diagnosis of the victim are consistent with the statements of the victim.

At the time of the instant case, F was assaulted against A by the suspect at the bottom of the photograph taken by the victim F's entrance report attached to the on-site visit report prepared by the police.