1. The Defendant’s KRW 23,729,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from August 12, 2014 to November 20, 2014.

The fact that the Plaintiff, a seller of land, supplied meat to the Defendant, who is a food producer from November 201 to August 11, 2014, and the Defendant did not pay KRW 23,729,000 out of the purchase price, can be acknowledged in full view of the overall purport of pleadings in each of the evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including evidence attached with a serial number). As such, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff damages for delay calculated at a rate of 23,729,000 per annum as prescribed in the Commercial Act from August 12, 2014 to November 20, 2014, the delivery date of a copy of the complaint of this case, and 20% per annum as prescribed in the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the day of full payment.

Although the defendant asserts that the defendant was supplied with meat too unsatisfy by the plaintiff compared to other kinds of meat sales business, and thereby caused damage to the defendant's business by losing the price competitiveness, it is not sufficient to recognize it by itself, and there is no evidence to acknowledge it differently, and since the price for supply of meat is determined by the agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.