A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2015. 10. 31. 경 피고인이 다니는 회사의 채무 변제를 독촉하기 위해 채무자 C가 거주하는 구리시 D 아파트 204동 1804호를 찾아가, 사실은 C의 아내인 E과 대화를 나눈 사실이 있을 뿐 E으로부터 폭행을 당한 사실이 없음에도, 위 일시, 장소에서 ‘E 이 오른 발로 낭 심을 걷어찼다’ 고 112 신고를 한 후, 신고를 받고 출동한 구리 경찰서 F 지구대 소속 경장 G에게 위와 같이 말하고, 같은 날 구리 경찰서 형 사과 경위 H에게 신고사실을 조사 받으면서 위와 같이 E이 피고 인의 낭 심을 걷어찼으니 처벌하여 달라는 취지로 진술하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant reported false facts to E for the purpose of having criminal punishment imposed upon E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police against the defendant;

1. The written statement of the defendant;

1. A list of cases for complaint;

1. A voice file that has been reported for a crime;

1. A criminal investigation report (CCTV review report);

1. Polate test results;

1. 15 copies of compilation photographs of CCTV images;

1. Two photographs showing the place where the victim makes a demonstration in front of the D apartment;

1. Application of CCTV video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes installed in an elevator;

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 156 of the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 157, 153, and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act mitigated by law;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The range of the recommended punishment [the scope of the recommended punishment] according to the sentencing guidelines, Type 1 (general dismissal] (one month to one year) in the mitigation area (special mitigation person], self-denunciation and confession;

2. Circumstances unfavorable to the determination of sentence: The crime in this case is deemed to be light in that the appropriate exercise of penal authority was disturbed due to the crime in this case;

It is impossible to do so, and in particular, the defendant has filed several complaints.