The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a legal entity established on November 6, 200 for the purpose of manufacturing and selling semiconductor equipment, and the Defendant is the chief person in charge of purchasing the Plaintiff, who overalls the Plaintiff’s purchase from March 2010 to December 2017.

B. On June 1, 2016, the Plaintiff supplied C Company (hereinafter referred to as “C”) with 642,05,250 won a total of KRW 40 per unit, G6CP EET equipment total of KRW 337,850,00 per unit, and KRW 337,850,000 per unit, respectively. On March 1, 2017, the Plaintiff supplied the D Company (hereinafter referred to as “D”) with 3 units of ECE equipment at its luminous storage factory. The average sales price of the supplied equipment was KRW 401,360,782.

(c)

원고는 2016. 6. 2.부터 2017. 8. 7.까지 아래와 같이 ‘SXQ Titler 헤드’ 가 포함된 장비들을 납품하였다.

순번 납품 처 장비 장착되는 SXQ Titler 헤드의 수 1 E TFT 3대 대당 5개, 합계 15개 2 CF 2대 대당 1개, 합계 2개 3 C TFT 4대 대당 5개, 합계 20개 4 F TFT 2대 대당 7개, 합계 14개 5 G CF 2대 대당 3개, 합계 6개

D. The representative director of the Plaintiff is H, and he is the vice president.

【Non-contentious facts, Gap evidence No. 1, Gap evidence No. 7-1, Eul evidence No. 53, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion

A. In analyzing the cost of the purchase of equipment to be supplied to D and C from June 1, 2016 to September 11, 2017, the Defendant intentionally calculated the low price purchase cost.

As a result, the Plaintiff supplied 3 EE equipment to D average 401,360,782 won, and C supplied 642,005,250 won per unit, and G6CP EE equipment to 337,850,000 won per unit.

The Plaintiff, due to the Defendant’s intentional purchase cost reduction, sold the EET equipment to D, 117,95,007 won per unit, G6CP equipment supplied to C, 76,635,72 won per unit, and G6CP EET equipment supplied to C, at a lower level.

As a result, the Plaintiff’s damages totaled 889,983.