1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following cases:

[Supplementary part] The 5th page 8 of the judgment of the first instance, "six cases" shall be added to "one case".

The 5th judgment of the court of first instance, the 5th to 13th judgment, shall be followed as follows:

In full view of the fact that an application for voluntary retirement has not been accepted by four persons during the period from 2014 to 2016, and that 60% of the voluntary retirement allowances stipulated in the Rules on voluntary retirement of this case has been paid as consolation benefits through consultation with the company, it is difficult to deem that the defendant company is unreasonable to accept the application for voluntary retirement of this case."

“On the other hand, the Plaintiff asserts to the effect that the Defendant Company is obligated to approve the Plaintiff’s application for voluntary retirement because the Plaintiff introduced the voluntary retirement system under the condition to abolish the short-term retirement benefits system. However, it is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant Company is obligated to approve the Defendant Company’s application for voluntary retirement on the sole basis of the written evidence in subparagraphs 8 and 12, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.”

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.