logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.04.21 2014고단471
도로법위반
Text

The defendant is innocent.

Reasons

1. A summary of the facts charged: (a) around 03:14 January 29, 1994, the Defendant violated the restrictions on vehicle operation of the road management agency by loading and operating the C vehicle owned by the Defendant in excess of 10 tons of the limited storage of the C vehicle owned by the Defendant in excess of 10 tons of the limited storage of the C vehicle owned by the Defendant; (b) around 03:7km at the street in front of the 3.7km of the New Jaindo Highway; and (c) at the third axis.

2. On December 29, 201, the Constitutional Court rendered a decision that "if an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits an offense under Article 84 subparagraph 1 of Article 84 in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine under the corresponding Article shall be imposed on the corporation," and thereby, Article 47 (2) of the Constitutional Court Act retroactively loses its effect pursuant to the proviso of Article 47 (2) of the same Act, which applies mutatis mutandis to the facts charged in this case by the public prosecutor.

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow