A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2018 Highest 429"

1. On February 25, 2013, the criminal defendant against the victim B made a false statement to the victim B (53 tax) who was a land owner in the vicinity of D located in the voice group of Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, the defendant made a false statement to the victim B (53 ) stating that “The cost of permission is required to develop the land located in Chungcheongnam-gun, and five million won and five million won and one would be immediately repaid after the loan.” The defendant made a change to the loan amount of five million won and five million won and the loan amount of five million won on March 15, 2013.

However, even if the Defendant borrowed the above money from the injured party, the Defendant did not think of the full amount of the permitted cost for land development, and there was no intention or ability to repay the above borrowed money until the due date for repayment promised to the injured party is due because the economic difficult situation at the time.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 5 million won in cash from the injured party on the same day.

2. On January 10, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim F, the Defendant concluded a new building construction contract with the victim F (52 tax) of the victim F (52) located in Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and the Defendant concluded a new building construction contract with the victim on the part of H and six parcels (6).

However, even if the defendant received money from the injured party, he did not think of it as the material purchase cost, and there was no intention or ability to complete the new construction work.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and was delivered KRW 10 million as material cost for the same day by the victim.

3. On January 2015, the Defendant against the victim J made an appraisal by telephone to the victim J (n, 58 years of age) who was introduced through K at a place in which a police officer was not a policeman at the beginning of January 2015.