logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.05.15 2019고단5862
사기
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year;

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Defendant C’s imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the District Court on February 5, 2014, with prison labor for the same year and four months

2. 13. The above judgment became final and conclusive.

【Criminal Facts】 Defendant B, around April 201, intended to borrow KRW 100 million via D, a branch office around April 201, 201, was introduced Defendant C, a hub for arranging illegal loans.

The Defendants, together with Defendant B, purchased the vehicle with the vehicle installment loan in the name of Defendant A, who was the dynamics of Defendant B, and then thought that the above vehicle would be sold and commercialized and divided into the price, so even if they received the vehicle installment loan from the victim E Co., Ltd., there was no intention or ability to repay the loan.

Nevertheless, the Defendants would pay 27.5% installments per annum for 36 months from the 36th anniversary of the year, so that the Defendants may purchase the only one motor vehicle for the No. NAS-si in the name of the victim in the name of the non-indicted used vehicle trading company in the name of the non-indicted used vehicle trading company around April 12, 201, with loans equivalent to KRW 37 million to the employees of the victim in the name of the non-indicted used vehicle trading company.

“The purpose is to make a false statement, and Defendant A prepared a motor vehicle installment contract with the same content as above.

As a result, the Defendants conspired in collusion to induce the above employees in the above name and caused the victim company to pay 37 million won in the seat to the F Co., Ltd. for the vehicle price.

Defendant B, around April 201, 201, intended to loan KRW 100 million through Doin D, Defendant B was introduced to Defendant C, which is the hub of illegal loan mediation.

Defendant

B and C intended to acquire loans by means of purchasing vehicles in the name of Defendant B, obtaining vehicle installment loans from Victim E Co., Ltd. and disposing of the purchased vehicles immediately and not repaying the loans.

The above Defendants are in broad time around April 13, 201.

arrow