1. The Defendant’s KRW 9,537,850 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from July 8, 2016 to January 13, 2017.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and public notice - Project name: Road project [B Corporation, Second (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”);

- Public Notice - On October 7, 2013 - Project implementer C: Defendant

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on October 22, 2015 (hereinafter “the instant ruling of expropriation”): 1,603 square meters of D forest and field (hereinafter “instant land”): The date of commencement of expropriation owned by the Plaintiff: December 15, 2015 - Compensation: 103,233,200 won (applicable unit price: 64,400 square meters) - the Uniform Certified Public Appraisal Corporation and the Pacific Appraisal Corporation (hereinafter “appraisal of expropriation”)

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on objection (hereinafter “the instant ruling”) dated May 26, 2016 - Contents of the ruling: (a) increase the Plaintiff’s compensation for losses to KRW 106,359,050 (unit price applied 66,350/m2): Telecommunications appraisal corporations and Alban appraisal corporations (hereinafter “appraisal”)

D. As a result of the court’s appraisal, E, an appraiser of this Court, assessed the adequate amount of compensation for losses on the instant land as KRW 115,896,900 (72,300/m2).

(hereinafter referred to as “court appraisal”). [Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1, 6, and Eul evidence 1 through 5 (including each number), the result of this court’s commission of appraisal to appraiser E, the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) purchased the instant land on December 9, 2009. At the time of purchase, the construction work to expand the existing secondary line road to the fourth line road adjacent to the instant land (FRoad Improvement Project was underway).

Accordingly, the Plaintiff purchased the instant land in KRW 174,600,000 so that the Plaintiff’s spouse, a forwarder, can use the instant land for the purpose of a garage.

However, the comparative standard selected by the instant ruling appraiser and the court appraiser is realistic to the instant land.