Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant had the record of having been issued a summary order of KRW 3 million by the same court on September 2, 201, in the Daegu District Court and racing support on December 1, 2006, for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, for fines of KRW 1 million, and a fine of KRW 2 million by the same court on September 25, 2008, and on September 2, 2010, for the same crime.
2. Criminal facts;
A. On July 6, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 20:27, around July 6, 2015, the Defendant driven D Poter cargo under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.157% without obtaining a driver’s license in the section of about 4km from the stong-si to the s to the stong-si road in which it is impossible to identify the trade name in the debris of the Ansan-dong-si.
B. On July 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 20:15 on July 13, 2015, the Defendant driven a DNA cargo vehicle while under the influence of alcohol 0.144% without obtaining a driver’s license in the section of about 15km from the 15km road in which it is impossible to find out the trade name in the debris of the Ansan-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si to the day of the same time-dong mooring.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Report on circumstances of each drinking driver, report on detection of drinking drivers, inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking driving, report on detection of violation of the Road Traffic Act and report on the results of the crackdown on drinking driving;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the driving license ledger;
1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of driving under influence of alcohol), subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act, and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act (the point of driving without permission); and
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;
1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is that the defendant has been punished by a fine for the same kind of crime.
The defendant is again the defendant.