1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Details of disposition;

A. On January 15, 2019, the Plaintiff was merged with the Defendant on February 15, 2019 with the land size of 12,824 square meters in the Cheongdo-gun, Chungcheongnam-do-gun, the Plaintiff owned by the Plaintiff, and the area of E orchard was increased to 12,824 square meters.

On the 3,356 square meters of a companion animal funeral hall (an animal crematory facility (an animal crematory facility (an animal crematory facility) and an animal charnel facility (an animal 292.96 square meters, 292.96 square meters), 2,406 square meters among the above B land and H road 25 square meters, and an access road (an access road (an animal funeral hall and an access road) with an area of 88 square meters among the 2,406 square meters of land and H road) was applied for a building permit, including an application for a building permit (an alteration of land form and quality), an application for a farmland diversion permit, and an application for a building permit.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant application”). Deliberation by the Urban Planning Committee, which fails to comply with the criteria for permission for development activities as a result of deliberation by the Urban and Gun Planning Committee, as an area where natural landscape and fear of damage to the aesthetic view and view of construction works, environmental pollution, such as noise, vibration, etc. caused by environmental pollution, and water supply and sewerage, which are infrastructure facilities, are not installed, was not implemented. In most complementary matters, most of the supplementary matters are opened access roads to cut the slope area about about about 17 meters after entry and the site was created, and the site was created. As a result, the site is located in the vicinity of the current location to review the location conditions for the concerns about distress development due to the sunshine with surrounding scenery and environment, and the housing environment of the residents of the animal funeral facility is damaged and permitted by many people as a evasion facility is at least at the location inappropriate, and it is a priority to ensure the residential environment of the residents and to improve the quality of their lives rather than legitimate exercise of property rights and economic purposes of individuals that are detrimental to the public interest.

B. The Defendant on April 2019.