1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff as to the defendant C, which constitutes the following amount of payment:

1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except the following part of the judgment of the court of first instance citing the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance.

2. Part to be used again; and

A. 3-B(A) of the judgment of the court of first instance as to whether the Plaintiff was negligent in selecting or administering the anesthesia method of this case (as to the fourth to fourth to fourth of the judgment of the court of first instance) (as to the fourth to fourth of the judgment of the court of first instance), and where Defendant C performed the instant anesthesia, there is a possibility of negotisis damage.

Inasmuch as it was aware that other mergers may occur or occur, it is necessary to implement the anesthesia of this case with careful attention, to verify images through a ultra-wave test in order to prevent anesthesia damage caused by increased anesthesia, and to select a approach to inserting dynasium and dynasium dynasium which may reduce the possibility of psychotropic damage. However, it is argued that there is negligence in failing to perform the above duty of care.

According to the descriptions of 1, 1, and 3 evidence, the appraisal statement prepared for mediation (ar arbitration) by the Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency is a method of using 1,00 megathal megathal megathal megathal megathy, with easy access to megathal guns and with low risk of megathic megathic megathic megathic megathy.

In order to prevent these mergers, it is necessary to confirm images and implement anesthesia, and to select other approaches (influences, chains, e.g.) in order to prevent e.g., 0. 0% to 0.2% to 19% to 0%.

However, the Lambling Crecing Law is specified in the textbook, and is used normally.

In this case, it is difficult to see that he failed to fulfill his duty of care in anesthesia, and it is a merger certificate inevitably occurred after anesthesia.