The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (one year of imprisonment and additional collection) against the Defendant on the summary of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the fact that the Defendant recognized the Defendant’s mistake as a whole and reflects the Defendant’s depth, the size of each game of this case’s game room is not large, and the duration of participation is relatively short, and there is no profit gained from the Defendant’s crime, each of the crimes of this case’s game room appears to have been actually living for a period of not less than five years after arrest, and the Defendant’s wife wanted the Defendant’s wife, etc. are favorable to the Defendant.

However, each of the crimes of this case committed the crime of this case, however, since the defendant was under the control of being an employee in the game of this case, he accepted the game of this case under the name of another person, employed a new employee, and repeated the crime at the same place in the same manner, and there is a significant criminal record in light of the circumstances and contents of the crime. In particular, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case again, even though he was sentenced to the suspended sentence for 2 years of imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act on January 21, 2010, which was sentenced to the suspended sentence for 2 years of the suspended sentence, and even if the defendant did not escape, it is highly probable that the suspended sentence

In full view of the circumstances that are unfavorable to the defendant, such as the appearance of the defendant, and other circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, and whether the change of circumstances occurred after the sentence of the lower judgment, etc., the lower court's punishment appears to be within a reasonable and appropriate scope, and is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.