1. As to the Plaintiff KRW 59,865,962 and KRW 47,401,774 among them, the Defendant shall start on April 25, 2014, and the remainder 12,464.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On December 6, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement on computers and monitors (the supplier is a note) (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) (hereinafter “instant goods”), and operated DPC bank (hereinafter “instant PC bank”) on the 2nd floor in Gwangju North-gu, Gwangju (hereinafter “instant PC bank”) using the instant goods.

B. Around October 2012, the Defendant entered into a contract with the Plaintiff to accept the instant PC and to take over the Plaintiff’s obligations under the instant lease agreement.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant acquisition agreement”). C.

The Plaintiff fulfilled all the obligations under the instant transfer agreement, and accordingly, the Defendant began to operate the instant PC in its name from November 2012.

As the Defendant did not pay the lease fee to the filial Capital, the Plaintiff paid the sum of KRW 47,401,774 as follows in the name of lease or redemption before maturity.

The amount on the date of repayment (unit: 20,472,493 on November 21, 2012) 1 20,472,493 20,003 on February 4, 2013: 20,520,000 on May 20, 2013; 1,00,000 on May 20, 2013; 20,000 on June 18, 2013; 40,007 on June 40, 200 on July 15, 200, 200, 36,28,50, 508 on August 45, 2013; 19,50 on May 13, 19, 2014;

E. The Defendant’s failure to pay the lease fees to the Fff Capital, and the Defendant paid KRW 12,464,188 to the Fff Capital (PP) of the instant goods supplier on August 29, 2014 in accordance with the re-purchase agreement, and received the Plaintiff’s claim against the Plaintiff based on the instant lease agreement from Fff Capital.

On October 6, 2014, the Plaintiff repaid KRW 12,464,188 under the lease agreement of this case to the Triman.

【In the absence of dispute, the grounds for recognition, Gap 1 through 7, Eul 9 (including virtual numbers), Eul 1, and Eul 1, respectively, and the validity of this court.