All appeals filed by the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff against the instant principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the principal office.

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: ① the Defendant’s “Defendant” was deleted; ② the Defendant’s “Defendant” of the first instance judgment’s 1-2 reasoning is changed to “Plaintiff”; ③ the reasons for the first instance judgment’s 2-1 reasoning.

The "two-day" of the 8th parallel shall be revised to "six-day", and 4-day reasons for the first instance judgment.

B. Along with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, the term “diduration” was modified to “didurers,” and the term “Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport No. 465” was amended to “Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport No. 577,” and the term “minimum standard of ground height” was amended to “the minimum standard of ground height” in Article 577 of the Decree of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, and the term “minimum standard of ground height” in Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act was amended to “the minimum standard of ground height”.

And only “G” (hereinafter referred to as “G”) and “F” (hereinafter referred to as “F”).

As a result of each appraisal commission to Eul, the following circumstances are found to be acceptable in view of the purport of the entire argument as a result of the fact inquiry to Eul, i.e., (i) appraiser H affiliated with G: (a) it is found that duratat of the vehicle of this case is more than surat of synthetic resin material; (b) the vehicle of this case at the time of the collision with a single strong strong object, and damage to the first and second DNA bottom of the vehicle of this case is different from the degree of damage, and there is no surat, it is very low in connection with the stofer.” (ii) The appraiser H made an additional appraisal by the method to contact the DNA base of the vehicle of this case at the site of the accident of this case, and as a result, it appears that the main damaged part of the durat of the vehicle of this case seems not to have contacted with Stofer, etc.