Text
1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 15,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from June 29, 2019 to February 26, 2020, and the next day.
Reasons
On March 4, 2008, the Plaintiff completed the marriage report with C on March 4, 2008, and thereafter had a child. The Defendant became aware of the same workplace rent C around February 2019, and committed unlawful acts, such as administering it to the accommodation facility with knowledge that C was in a marital relationship with the Plaintiff, may be recognized by comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings, such as the descriptions in subparagraphs 1 through 7, etc.
According to this, the defendant is liable for compensating for mental damage suffered by the plaintiff due to the above tort, since he violated or obstructed the plaintiff's community life or the maintenance of the plaintiff's marital life and infringed the plaintiff's rights as his spouse.
Furthermore, considering the period and contents of fraudulent act which can be recognized by comprehensively taking into account the purport of the entire arguments on the evidence mentioned above, the period of marriage between the plaintiff and C, the degree of failure in the marriage between the plaintiff and C, and the degree of mental suffering, it is reasonable to determine the amount of consolation money to be paid to the plaintiff by the defendant as 15,00,00
Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 15,00,000 won as well as damages for delay calculated at the rate of 5% per annum as stipulated in the Civil Act from June 29, 2019 to February 26, 2020, which is the date when the judgment of this case is rendered, and 12% per annum as stipulated in the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the date of full payment, since it is obvious that the delivery day of the copy of the complaint of this case claimed by the plaintiff from June 29, 2019, which is the day after the date when the plaintiff was served with a copy of the complaint of this case for which the plaintiff 15,000,000 won