A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 2543"

1. On June 3, 2016, at around 09:55, the Defendant: (a) opened a door to the door of the victim D (the 32 years of age) in North-gu, Gwangju; (b) opened the door; (c) opened the door; (d) opened the door to report the Defendant; (d) opened the door to close the door; and (e) opened the door by force, and went into the door to threaten the victim with each item (64cm in length) dangerous articles.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous things and invaded upon the victim's residence.

"2016 Highest 2812"

2. On June 5, 2016, around 04:50 on June 5, 2016, the Defendant entered a Vietnama for the reason that the Defendant came to the house of the victim victim F of the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, and invaded on the victim’s residence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Each statement of victims;

1. Application of each film-related statute, such as site and each item photograph, field photograph, etc.;

1. Relevant Article 320 of the Criminal Act, Articles 320 and 319 (1) of the Criminal Act (special intrusion upon residence), Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) and the main sentence of Article 62-2(2) of the Criminal Act of the Probation Order is not that of the crime, considering the contents of the crime and the victims’ appraisal.

However, the defendant did not intrude into the residence for the purpose of special crimes.

It seems that the defendant's mental illness had an impact on the crime.

There is no criminal record of the same kind.

In addition, the sentencing conditions shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime, shall be determined as ordered.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.