The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable as it is too uneasible that the lower court’s punishment (the imprisonment of six months, the suspension of execution of two years, the community service order 80 hours, and the lecture attendance order 40 hours) is too uneased

2. The crime of this case was committed by a police officer who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report that the defendant assaultss his wife and his children in a de facto marital relationship, and assaulted another police officer who provided assistance that was arrested and carried out in an act of committing an act of committing an act of committing an offense, which is not in the nature of the crime, and is in need of strict punishment to establish the national legal order and eradicate the general public order, and the fact that the injured police officer did not receive a letter from the police officer up to now shows an attitude against his mistake, or that there was no other punishment force except for the violence crime in 199 and 200, and there was no other punishment force except for the defendant's age, sex, home environment, motive and background of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, etc., as well as the sentencing guidelines and the result of the application of the Supreme Court's sentencing guidelines and the sentencing of the Committee.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.