logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원강릉지원 2020.09.25 2020고정123
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From around 13:06 to 13:12 on July 28, 2019, the Defendant connected the Defendant’s residence to the “E” from Gangnam-si B and 19 persons, including the victim D, to the “E” at the open hold of the Kakao Stockholm, which is part of the Defendant’s residence, and there is only one victim at the opening opening opening, and even though the victim’s real name was disclosed in the middle of the posting, the Defendant was able to conceal the fact to the Defendant, and even if the victim’s real name was disclosed in the middle of the posting, he was able to look back to the Defendant while he had his original overf and two daughters, and continued de facto marriage, and even after the end of the posting, he would no longer walk the same way. (vi) After which he reported the marriage with the female who was H and posted it to the Cheongju, and then he was able to get a large amount of female prison and his economic wind. (iii) At the same time, I were able to divorce with the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by divulging facts openly through the information and communication network for the purpose of slandering the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Investigation report (I and telephone communications) on the statement of the police about D, and the application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing open hosting posting;

1. Article 70 (1) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. concerning facts constituting a crime and Article 70 (1) of the same Act;

1. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the Detention in Labor House (limited to cases where the suspension of execution of a sentence is invalidated or revoked);

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the defendant confessions and reflects the crime, the fact that the defendant posted words transmitted by the former spouse of the victim as it is, and the defendant has no record of other crimes except punishment of a small amount of fine

arrow