1. According to the expansion of the plaintiff's purport of the claim in this court, the defendant small enterprise corporation, and Eul are jointly engaged in.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation as to this case is as follows, except for a claim extended by the plaintiff in this court and the defendant’s additional assertion as to this case. Thus, this part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

8 pages 15 to 19 of the first instance judgment are as follows.

As the Plaintiff sought payment of KRW 127,481,50 per annum from the first instance court to the Plaintiff, and KRW 50,70,190,50 per annum from the 15th instance court to the 15th day of delivery of the Plaintiff’s complaint, the Plaintiff’s obligation to pay KRW 178,190,50 per annum from the 15th day of delivery of the complaint to the 15th day of payment of the Plaintiff’s damages for delay from the 15th day of payment of the complaint to the 15th day of payment of the complaint, the Defendants’ obligation to pay 178,481,50 per annum from the 15th day of payment of the complaint to the 15th day of payment of the complaint, and from the 15th day of payment of the damages for delay from the 15th day of payment of the complaint to the 15th day of payment of the complaint to the 15th day of payment of the complaint.