1. Attached disposition taken by the head of the Dong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City District Office of Education to the Plaintiff A, B, and C on July 13, 2012.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiffs are operating each of the “private teaching institutes” as indicated in the “private teaching institute name” in the attached list of the attached disposition that educates elementary, middle, and high school students in the Defendants’ jurisdiction, including Korean language, English, academic, and scientific (hereinafter “private teaching institutes”).

B. On February 28, 2012, the Defendants confirmed the standards for the adjustment of tuition fees of private teaching institutes and teaching schools within the jurisdiction (hereinafter “private teaching institutes, etc.”) (hereinafter “the instant adjustment standards”) as stated in the attached table of adjustment standards, following deliberation by the Mediation Committee for Teaching Fees, etc. (hereinafter “Mediation Committee”) under Article 17 of the Enforcement Decree of the Act on the Establishment and Operation of Private Teaching Institutes and Extracurricular Lessons (hereinafter “Mediation Committee”).

C. On March 8, 2012, the Defendants: (a) prepared a registration statement of tuition fees, etc. (report) in accordance with the instant adjustment criteria; and (b) notified the Defendants of the change thereof by the 23th day of the same month; and (c) the Plaintiffs determined tuition fees (hereinafter “each of the instant tuition fees”) as indicated in the “application for Adjustment” column in the attached list, and submitted each registration (report).

The head of the Dong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Education Support Office (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant-dong Education Support Office") shall provide the plaintiff A, B, and C (hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiff-A, etc.") on April 4, 2012, and the head of the office of education of the Southern District Education Support Office of the defendant Daegu Metropolitan City (hereinafter referred to as the "head of the education Support Office of defendant

6. Plaintiff D, E, F, G, H, I, and J (hereinafter “Plaintiff D, etc.”) requested relevant documentary evidence, such as the registration fee calculation statement, cash account statement, copy of cash account statement, financial statements, credit card sales and cash receipt computation statement, loan repayment certificate, lease contract, copy of the student register, copy of the instructor’s status and contract, copy of the instructor’s wage payment status, etc., on the ground that each of the instant tuition fees exceeded the instant adjustment standard, and the Plaintiffs submitted the said documentary evidence to the Defendants respectively.

E. The Defendants on June 5, 2012.