logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.06.02 2013고단5503
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 1, 2007, the Defendant against the victim B made a false statement to the effect that, at a coffee shop located in the Jung-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, “B had worked in Rots before e.g., he had good records and sent out study to Paris from the company to Paris, and only the person who served in Rots can be treated as the company. As such, if you purchase the product and deliver it to three of the Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, that operates each type of business, a large amount of profits may be earned, and if 5 million won is invested, 350,000 won can be paid monthly as profits and returned the principal after one year.”

However, the Defendant did not have any special career and did not have any capacity or intent to engage in cosmetic-related business, which is a well-known brand of beauty products, as an employee of an enterprise leasing a well-known referring to female employees of entertainment establishments. Moreover, the Defendant paid 350,000 won per month with investment profits and did not have any intent or ability to return the principal of investment after one year.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received from the victim the transfer of 15 million won in total, to the account under the name of the Defendant under the name of the victim for the purpose of making investments.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On February 26, 2008, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant, at the victim E’s house located in the Daegu Northern-gu F, Daegu Northern-gu, 2008, the said victim would pay sales proceeds and return the principal after one year if he/she made an investment in the sales business of Loh’s products with a clear prospect and a large amount of profit, making an investment in the sales business of Loh’s products.”

However, as described in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant wishes to return the principal for the business of notification and for one year after the date.

arrow