Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 3.5 million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a D-Wood vehicle.

On December 17, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle around 11:03 on December 17, 2013, and driven the three-lane road in front of the new apartment in the Pungdong, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, along the three-lane direction in the direction of the Pungpo-gu, in the direction of the sleep.

Since there is a place where a signal light and crosswalk are installed, it is necessary to confirm whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle is a person to reduce the speed and to see well the front door, and to safely drive the motor vehicle according to the traffic signal and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and continues to proceed at the same speed even if the signal is changed to a stop signal.

According to the pedestrian signals, the victim E (56 years of age, female) who cross the crosswalk from the right side to the left side was found late, and the victim E (56 years of age, female) was urgently operated to avoid this.

However, the victim's body blurged in front of the defendant's blurged vehicle without being faced by the defendant, and blurged the victim into the ground.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence that requires approximately 11 prudent treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the traffic accident investigation report, traffic accident occurrence report, diagnosis certificate, on-site photograph Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1), Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not mean that the degree of negligence of the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order, and the result of the victim’s injury is more severe, the defendant himself/herself repents his/her mistake in depth, the defendant has agreed with the victim (see this Court’s agreement received on April 14, 2014), the primary offender, and other conditions of sentencing.