logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 특허법원 2015.07.23 2014허7486
거절결정(특)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

(a) Name of the invention in this case 1: B) the filing date of the application/the filing date of the priority claim/ the application number: the applicant: (a) the Plaintiff’s claims (amended by January 9, 2014) 1) ; (b) the nature and characteristics of each expropriation price within the instant electric system ; (c) the addition of each of the electric equipment to be used at each end of each quarter of the expropriation price and its importance; (d) the value of the electrical supply and demand should be within the same value given in the manner of giving the same value under the order of priority of demand adjustment in accordance with the nature and importance of each of the equipment being used at each end of the instant system ; (d) the level at which each of the foregoing risk factors should be reflected in the level of electricity supply and demand (including an intermediate intermediary type accepting the fluor of the electrical equipment; hereinafter referred to as “level 1”) and the level at which each of the above risk factors changes in the system should be reflected in the level of electricity supply and demand (hereinafter referred to as “level of the foregoing risk element”) to the level of the foregoing.

arrow