1. The Defendants shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

2. When Defendant A does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. A person holding the status of stay for Defendant A’s overseas Koreans (F-4) was unable to engage in a simple labor practice, but the Defendant, even though he/she was unable to engage in a simple labor practice, employed a person having no status of stay to engage in a simple labor practice by hiring C (D) who is staying in China as a visa (F-4-25) from June 1, 2014 to July 10, 2014, at the monthly intervals of KRW 100,000 per day.

2. Defendant B, Defendant B, a representative, employed Defendant A who did not have the above status of stay, thereby violating the Immigration Control Act in relation to the business of the corporation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Original register of domestic abode reports for foreign nationality Koreans;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written notice of examination and decision;

1. Defendant A: Article 94 Subparag. 9 of the Immigration Control Act and Article 18(3) (Selection of Fine): Defendant B, a stock company under Article 99-3 Subparag. 2, Article 94 Subparag. 9 of the Immigration Control Act and Article 18(3) (Selection of Fine) of the Immigration Control Act;

1. Defendant A at a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders;