The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The gist of the defendant's appeal is that the court below did not recognize that the defendant committed each of the crimes in this case under the condition of mental disorder under the influence of alcohol. Thus, the court below erred by misunderstanding the facts about mental disorder or by misunderstanding the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment, and the punishment (one year of imprisonment) sentenced by the court below is too unreasonable.

However, according to the records of this case, at the time of each of the crimes of this case, the defendant had no or weak ability to discern things or make decisions.

The defendant's mental and physical argument is not reasonable, and in full view of various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing as shown in this case, since the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the defendant is too unreasonable, and therefore, the defendant's improper argument in sentencing

Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.