1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are both balls and dunes.

1. On December 3, 2016, Defendant A: (a) around 23:40, at the Changwon-si, Yongsan-si, Masan-si, the head of the Sinsan-si, Defendant A: (b) reported that the vehicle parked at the entrance of the parking lot; (c) returned the vehicle to E, who was in the situation belonging to the Msan-dong Police Station D District of the Msan-dong Police Station, called the vehicle for the difficulty of passage; (d) and (e) sent the vehicle to E, who was rejected, and (e) took a bath for the said vehicle, she

Defendant

A, as above, has interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers in relation to the prevention and suppression of crimes.

2. At the time and place set forth in paragraph 1, Defendant B arrested a flagrant offender with suspicion of interference with the performance of official duties from Defendant B, a pair of balls, with Defendant B’s flaps, and flapsed with Defendant B’s flaps, who was called with Defendant B, with Defendant B, with Defendant B, with Defendant B’s her hand, was shaken.

Defendant

B interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers in relation to the prevention and suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of each protocol of statement to E and F prepared by the police;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment (elective of imprisonment);

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act for suspended sentence;

1. Defendant A [Scope of Recommendation] Defendant A [No person who has been sentenced to a special sentencing] in the basic area (from June to January, 1) of Category A (Interference with the performance of official duties and coercion of duties) [Judgment of sentence] [Judgment of sentence], six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution (the fact that Defendant A acknowledges and reflects his mistake, the fact that there is no past record of suspended execution or higher, and again, Defendant A did not repeat the crime of interference with the performance of official duties.

(3) such consideration as the

2. Defendant B [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (from June to January, 1) (the person subject to special sentencing) (the person subject to sentencing) within the basic area (from June to April) of the Act on the Obstruction of the Performance of Official Duties) (the decision of sentence), six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution (the fact that Defendant B acknowledges and reflects his mistake, and there is no past record of suspended execution or higher).