1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a management body comprised of sectional owners of Mapo-gu Seoul Etel (hereinafter "Etel"), an aggregate building, pursuant to the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings (hereinafter "the Aggregate Buildings Act"), and the plaintiffs are sectional owners of Etel 1504 (Plaintiff A), 1606 (Plaintiff B), 604 (Plaintiff C), and 1515 (PlaintiffD).

B. On November 13, 2014, the Defendant Assembly (i.e., the court’s decision to permit the convocation of a temporary management body meeting on June 26, 2014, by 73 non-party Etel owners requested the Defendant (at the time, “Ebuilding Steering Committee” was “Ebuilding Steering Committee”) to convene a temporary management body meeting on June 26, 2014, and the number of 68 persons, such as H, among them, were refused to convene a temporary management body meeting.

On October 15, 2014, the above court grants permission to convene an extraordinary meeting of the Etel management body for the purpose of meeting the appointment of manager by December 10, 2014, the election of the president of the management body, the resolution of the management method (change of the management body), and the enactment of the management rules.

On October 15, 2014, the 68 sectional owners, including H, who proceed with the procedure to convene the Doll Emergency Countermeasure Committee, shall publicly announce the appointment of manager (representative) on November 13, 2014, the president of the general meeting, the establishment of management rules, the decision on management methods, and the change of controlled entities, as the agenda item (hereinafter “instant management body meeting”) in the name of “H of the chairperson of the Etel Emergency Countermeasure Committee,” and then send a notice to each sectional owner of the Etel, a letter of notice, and the letter of delegation attached thereto, to each sectional owner of the Etel, by registered mail.

Article 75.83 square meters among 12,80,000 square meters of all Etel owners, and 12,807.19 square meters of all exclusive ownership, were present at the meeting of the management body of this case. Of these, H as to the appointment of a manager with the consent of 139 sectional owners, 7,104.97 square meters of a charged oil area, among those cases, as the defendant’s manager.