logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원진주지원 2020.03.10 2019가단6207
전세금보증금 반환
Text

1. The defendant shall deliver the apartment and D from the plaintiff in Jinju City at the same time, and at the same time, KRW 150 million to the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

2. Judgment by service (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).

3. Some dismissed parts of the Plaintiff claimed for the delayed payment from the day following the delivery date of the copy of the complaint of this case with respect to the lease deposit, but the Defendant’s obligation to return the lease deposit is concurrently performed with the Plaintiff’s obligation to deliver the apartment of this case. Thus, the Defendant is liable to pay damages for delay with respect to the lease deposit only after the Plaintiff received the delivery of the apartment of this case from

Therefore, the evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that the plaintiff delivered the apartment as stated in Paragraph (1) of this Article to the defendant or provided the performance thereof, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, and thus, the plaintiff's claim for damages for delay is without merit.

arrow