A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the Road Traffic Act (non-accidentd measures) are those who are engaged in driving of Branchising automobiles;

On February 10, 2014, the Defendant driven the said car with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.218% around 21:35, while under the influence of alcohol, and led to the front road of 909-8, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon to proceed from the distance of the inspection team to the inspection team.

In front of the defendant's proceeding direction, the victim C(50 years old) driver's D urban bus stops in order to get passengers to board and alight. In such a case, the driver has a duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by taking into account the situation of the vehicle in front.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not avoid the above urban bus stopping at the bus stops due to occupational negligence, which is in difficult to drive in a normal condition due to influence of drinking, and received the front part of the Defendant’s car as the front part of the bus.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim C, such as knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee kne, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment. At the same time, even if the above city bus was damaged to

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) in a section of approximately 1.5 km from the front line of the main station in the vicinity of the inspection team distance in the Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon at a time to the road of the same spon, driving the car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.218% from the section of approximately 1.5 km to the same spon road.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;