logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2013.03.28 2012고단3621
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. Violation of the restriction on the temporary operation of cargo drivers belonging to the summary order (the Jeonju District Court) subject to the summary order subject to the review of the facts charged of this case: (a) Violation of the restriction on the operation of the temporary location of cargo drivers belonging to the summary order of the facts charged of this case; (b) Violation of the restriction on the restriction on the operation of B on December 1, 1996, 196, No. 3483, Dec. 28, 1995, No. 06:3

2. Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005) which is a joint penal provision among the applicable provisions of the facts charged in the instant case was invalidated retroactively due to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality, such as Supreme Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga38, Oct. 28, 2010.

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow