The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant, at around 14:40 on May 7, 2015, committed a theft by putting the amount equivalent to KRW 3,000 (30 Doz. 30,000), which is the market price of the victim E (the male and 73 years old), in the 3rd floor of the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Cbuilding, and the D’s office where she works as her employee, into the 3,000 Doz. 10,000 Doz.

7. From 14. up to 14. As shown in the list of crimes in the annexed sheet, the parts corresponding to KRW 5,367,700 (amount claimed by the injured party) were stolen over 20 times before and after that time.

2. The Defendant asserts that the investigation agency has consistently brought ample-, ample-, ample-, or ample-, manufactured parts without the permission of the complainant, and does not constitute larceny.

In a criminal trial, a judge can find facts constituting a crime only based on strict evidence that leads to a lack of reasonable doubt.

In a case where the prosecutor failed to prove sufficient proof to the extent that such conviction was made, even if there is a suspicion of guilt against the defendant, the judge shall make a judgment in the interest of the defendant.

According to the records of this case, the defendant served in the company operated by the complainant from January 2013 to July 14, 2015. The total amount of overdue wages to the complainants around the time of the company's maturity is 18.6 million won,