1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3. The judgment of the court of first instance stated in paragraph (1) of the same Article.

1. The reasons for the acceptance by the court of first instance are as follows, and they are cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, given that the reasons for the acceptance by the court of first instance are the same as the reasons for the judgment of first instance except for addition

[Supplementary Part] Subsequent to the 4th 10th 10th 10th 10 judgment, the following is added.

Even according to the official document (Evidence A No. 25) sent by the Defendant to the Plaintiff, the following descriptions shall be added to the six-day compensation for delay, which is the six-day compensation for delay of the Defendant’s response to the possible sample offer, where the responsibility of the ordering agency is delayed, and it is possible to exempt the Defendant from the liability.

“The Plaintiff appears to have actively endeavored to comply with the delivery date of the instant contract, such as taking contact with the U.S. local enterprise or making a request for prompt production by visiting the U.S. local enterprise to secure Ewons necessary for the production of the instant product.” [The part used] Each “20,18,908 won” of the first instance judgment 7 7 7 7 7 and 8 8 20,026,919 won, respectively.

The 7th 7th 10th 7th 7th 7th 10th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7

7 pages 7 of the judgment of the first instance court, “The Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings” was amended to read “the main sentence of Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings; Article 2(1) of the Addenda to the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings (Presidential Decree No. 29768, May 21, 2019); Article 3(1) main sentence of Article 3(1) of the former Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings (amended by Presidential Decree No. 29768, May 21, 2019).”

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. The "20,188,908 won" in the judgment of the court of first instance is a clerical error in the judgment of the court of first instance as "20,026,919 won."