1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs falling under the following amount of order for payment shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning for this part of the reasoning is as follows, and the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance (one to six pages) is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the reasoning for this part is written or added as follows. Thus, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The following shall be added between the fourth three parallels in the first instance judgment and the fourth parallels:

“5) As to the beneficiary of the death of the insured, the first insurance contract of this case is determined as the Plaintiff A, and the other insurance contracts as the legal heir of the insured.

The June 12th of the first instance judgment "for the plaintiff" shall be added to "A".

"6,312,700 won" in 6,312,70 won for death of 5,00,000 won for special expenses of KRW 961,479 for the interest of KRW 351,221 for the interest of KRW 961,479 for a death of 6,312,70 won for 6th half of the judgment of the first instance. The 6th half of the judgment of the first instance is "each entry of 1 evidence, witness" with "each entry of 1,8 evidence and witness of the first instance court".

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiffs asserted that they were able to receive a swimming in the Riart of this case.

This constitutes death caused by a disaster or injury, and the Defendants are obliged to pay the Plaintiffs, who are the beneficiary of the accident or the heir of the deceased, with the insurance money for death or injury, and delay damages.

B. The Deceased of the Defendants’ assertion died due to the disease, not due to a disaster or injury, but due to a disease of “pathocule Macule Macul Macul

This does not constitute “the death of an friendly accident” or “the death of an injured person as a direct result of an injury” as stipulated in each of the instant insurance contracts. Thus, the Defendants are not liable to pay the Plaintiffs the accident death insurance money or the injury death insurance money as stipulated in each of the instant insurance contracts.

3. Determination

A. The insured is a contingency among the requirements of the insured events secured by the insurance contract in accordance with the relevant legal doctrine that recognizes the liability to pay the insurance proceeds.