1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. In accordance with the expansion of the purport of the claim in the trial, the defendants shall be jointly and severally.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a non-profit public interest corporation established under the National Health Insurance Act that conducts the health insurance business, and the Defendant’s Federation of Private Passenger Passenger Transport Business (hereinafter “Defendant Association”) is a mutual aid business entity that has concluded a mutual aid agreement with respect to B B B B vehicles owned by the Defendant (hereinafter “A vehicle”).

B. On December 6, 2009, at around 01:46, Defendant A driven a sea-going vehicle, and turned the new Linyeong-dong, Seogu, Seo-gu, Seog-gu, to the Seogjin-gu, Seogyeong-gu, Seog-gu, Seog-gu, to the Seogjin-gu, Seog-gu,

Since it is a private-distance intersection with a signal apparatus, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has the duty of care to make a left-hand turn according to the signals of the signal apparatus.

Nevertheless, Defendant A, due to the negligence in the course of duties in violation of a straight-line left left-hand turn, conflicted the left-hand side of the D driving car (hereinafter “victim”) driven by C in accordance with the straight-line care in the straight-line four-distance away from the left-hand side of the straight-line.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

E, which was on board the damaged vehicle due to the instant accident, was treated as health insurance by medical care institutions, such as F Hospital, G hospital, and H hospital, etc., by suffering from injuries, such as light blood, cerebralopia, external liver, external liver, and external cerebralopia, etc.

Accordingly, from May 10, 2013 to December 9, 2013, the Plaintiff paid the sum of KRW 11,784,920 in total, and KRW 4,205,930 in total, and KRW 2,489,480,170 in total, from January 3, 2014 to March 7, 2014, and from April 12, 2010 to September 6, 2016, as medical care benefits to the relevant medical care institution.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 14, purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, Defendant A is the driver of a sea-going vehicle, and the Defendant Union is the mutual aid business operator of a sea-going vehicle, E suffers from the instant accident.