A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

On May 23, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Automobile Management Act at the Seo-gu District Court Branch Branch on May 23, 201, and completed the execution of the sentence on December 6, 2014.

around 18:40 on March 3, 2015, the Defendant of “2016 High Order 277” to the victim C at the Mono-si adjacent to the Geum-dong, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City), “The accounts to be used by the Defendant exceeded the limit of one-day transfer, and the amount of KRW 3.3 million is transferred to the corporate bank accounts in the name of the global global name of the K-si, and the amount of money is immediately repaid to the lender.

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, the defendant thought that he/she will borrow money from the damaged party to repeated gambling, did not have any certain occupation or property, card payments and living expenses were insufficient, and there was no intention or ability to pay money normally, such as the situation where he/she could not pay a fine or fine.

As above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) transferred KRW 3.3 million to the corporate bank account in the global name of the case corporation (4270893170101012) on the same day from the victim; and (c) used it as game money; (d) from around that time to July 8, 2015, the Defendant received KRW 11.7 million in total from the victim over 13 times, as shown in attached Table 1 re-abs.

On June 1, 2015, the Defendant posted a letter on June 1, 2015, stating that he/she sold visual visibility on the Internet “D” camera, and concluded that he/she sent 450,000 won visual visibility to the victim E who had contacted with the Defendant.

However, even if the defendant received money from the injured party, the defendant did not intend to sell the visibility.

The Defendant received KRW 4,50,00 from the injured party to the Agricultural Cooperative (G) account in the name of F used by the Defendant for the same day, and from that time, received the total of KRW 17,80,000 from four victims through the same method until October 1, 2015.